Relatives' Heartache Over Coastal Erosion Threatening Norfolk Graves
Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards
The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.
“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Searching for Solutions and Clarity
An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.
Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”
He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”
The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.